Manifest Destiny – Personal Statement Example
When Humanity is at Risk Manifest destiny is a concept first introduced by John OSullivan in 1845. It explains that the justification for American expansion is the country’s fate to do so. Whilst a non-written policy, manifest destiny has become the foundation of several American policies such as the Homestead Act and has served as the guiding principle of American foreign relations.
The term itself suggests a clear motive of a destined “moral” obligation that defends United State of America’s expansionary course of action. Any government must never use a pre-determined fate as their guiding principle, because every action of a country is a result of its leader’s rationalization.
Since 1898, America has joined several wars both in Europe and in the Pacific. Although some American leaders use manifest destiny as a rationale behind these wars, it must be noted that they are not examples or ideals of manifest destiny. US joined these wars for a number of reasons and whatever these reasons are, the idea of balancing of choices are there. The arguments of joining wars vary from simply saying ‘it is a needed war’ for it is a ‘humanitarian war’ which explains the different reasons for America’s war efforts. The drive of the US to join wars abroad is its intention to defend its people at home.
It has never asserted itself in the international arena as a single, most powerful country in the world but instead, it follows laws created and ratified by nations. Never did America intervene in any conflict around the world without being asked by the nations involved in the disagreement for help. Most often than not, it stands for what is right and what is wrong for manifest destiny is only an excuse for those countries which do not have any logical reason behind their expansionary course of actions. As for America, its wars are not to declare manifest destiny to save the world but it simply does what must be done to save its people and the humanity as a whole. And when humanity is at risk, perhaps any liberal-democratic country would stand by the principles of equality, freedom and justice.