Is The Culture Of South Korea Individualistic Or Collectivist (you Can Include Any Historical – Research Paper Example
Korean Culture Prof Korean culture is world famous. It is spread throughout the world in the form of movies and music. The economy of the country is also famously strong. In forty years Korea has grown from one of the poorest to one of the richest countries in the world. But how has it achieved this success? What sort of culture does the country have—can it be said to be individualistic or collectivist?
What are values? Everyone society decides for itself what they believe to be right and wrong, but they are often powerfully influenced by the people and traditions around them. Some people have been colonized by other dominant countries and therefore have a slight inferiority complex. Others belong to ethnic and linguistic minorities—facts which influence the way they see the world. Some countries have religions which encourage them to have large families. All this must be taken into account when entering another country with the intention to understand their culture. All of this must be taken into account when looking at Korea.
Korean are a collectivist people. They have spent years being colonized and this has led to a number of cultural phenomenon that play a role in every Koreans life (Joungwon, 21). Many Koreans have an us versus them view of the world. Confucianism has a powerful influence and this is not an individualistic practice. The Korean people have had to sacrifice together for many years in order to preserve their culture and way of life.
Additionally, rigid social roles prevent people from being too individualistic (Joe, 32). People are not encouraged to get outside of their traditional roles. They must maintain public face, and cannot afford to take big risks that might let down their families.
For all of these reasons it can be said that Koreans are collectivist.
Joe, W.J. & Choe, H.A. (1997). Traditional Korea: A Cultural History, Seoul: Hollym,.
Joungwon, A.K. 1975). Divided Korea: The Politics of Development, Harvard University Press.